Mid-market enterprise
Build the Agentic Enterprise.
We redesign high-value workflows around AI agents — on the systems you already run. One workflow first. Then the architecture.
A decade in production operations — including aerospace
- Architect/
- Integrate/
- Deploy/
- Operate
Operating background
- 10+
- Years inside production planning and operations systems.
- Aerospace
- Environments where a missed day costs the operation.
- Production
- The operating environment, not a workshop or a demo stack.
- Founder-led
- The person on the first call stays accountable for the architecture.
What we solve
Start where the work stalls.
Choose the closest operating problem. The next page shows a practical first workflow, the human boundary, and the metrics to baseline.
- 01Exceptions are piling upInvoices, reconciliations, close tasksExplore finance workflows
- 02Requests bounce between teamsEmail, tickets, portal intakeExplore customer operations
- 03Approvals hold up the workRequests, vendors, purchase ordersExplore procurement workflows
- 04Known work keeps repeatingService desk tickets and runbooksExplore IT workflows
How we work
Prove one workflow. Expand the architecture.
We do not start with a platform. We start with the process that can return the most, put it in production, then grow the same runtime across the company. The first conversation is thirty minutes, free, with the architect. You leave knowing whether it is worth building, what would have to be true, and what a first paid step would be.
- 01DiagnoseMap the work, baseline it, and choose the first workflow.
- 02DesignDefine tools, permissions, approvals, and evaluation.
- 03DeployPut the workflow on the systems you already run.
- 04ExpandMeasure the result, then reuse the architecture.
What the first build measures
Hours, cycle time, resolution, accuracy. Not model names.
These are illustrative workflow patterns, not client case studies. The baseline and result are measured on your process before anything expands.
Invoices that do not match
An exception pile waits for someone to dig it out.
The packet assembles itself. A person approves the posting.
A request that bounces between teams
Hours lost re-keying and chasing an owner.
Context gathered and a resolution drafted in minutes.
The ticket that has a known fix
The runbook exists. Nobody follows it at volume.
Routine tickets close against the runbook. The rest escalate.
Quote requests in the inbox
Sellers rebuild the same quote again and again.
A draft lands in the CRM. Unmatched lines never auto-send.
If the workflow cannot pay the build back inside months, we say so.
The runtime
Work arrives. A draft comes back. A person approves the send.
One governed runtime between the systems you already run. Not a chat window on the side.
Illustrative starting point
Finance
Turn repetitive finance operations into governed agentic workflows.
The first workflow is usually an exception pile: invoices that do not match, recs that wait, close tasks that are the same every month. An agent can assemble the packet and propose the posting. It does not own the books.
Who this is for
You will hear no if it is no.
A good fit
- Mid-market companies running real operations — ERP, CRM, or a service desk already in place.
- A process with volume and a clear owner: orders, invoices, tickets, handoffs.
- A decision-maker who can attend the first call and commit to a paid build if the numbers work.
Not a fit
- A ChatGPT training session for staff. That is not architecture.
- A strategy deck, or a pilot that is never meant to reach production.
- Replacing your systems. We connect to what you run; we do not rip it out.
Straight answers
What decision-makers ask first.
What happens in the thirty minutes?
You walk through one process that already runs — where it starts, who touches it, where it stalls. We map it live and tell you whether an agent belongs in it, where a person still decides, and what a first paid build would be. If the answer is no, you will hear no.
What does the first paid step look like?
One workflow in production on your systems: intake, drafts, approvals, an audit trail, and measurement. Scoped and priced after the diagnostic. If it cannot pay for itself in months, we say so and part as friends.
Which systems do you work with?
The ones you already run. ERP, CRM, service desk, mail, files, systems of record. The architecture connects through their APIs and identity — no rip-and-replace, no new platform to buy.
Where do our data and our customers sit in this?
Inside your tenancy, under your permissions. Every action is permissioned and logged, and anything that commits to a customer, a ledger, or production stays with a person. Happy to sign your NDA before the call.
We already have an IT team and integrators.
Good. They keep the keys. The work lands as architecture, documentation, and running code your team owns — we stay on only as long as the expansion needs us.
Start with one workflow
Prove it. Then expand.
Thirty minutes, free, with the architect who would run the work. You leave with a yes or a no — and the number for the first paid step.